South Africa

AA’s 2022 entry-level vehicle safety report proves encouraging

Written by enews

The AA recently tested 38 vehicles, categorised into three groups based on their safety ratings. These categories are: Acceptable Safety, Moderate Safety and Poor Safety. In the 2022 entry-level vehicle safety (ELVS) report, which assess available safety features on entry-level vehicles available locally, four vehicles were categorised under Poor Safety, 23 are in the Moderate Safety category, and 11 vehicles are placed in the Acceptable Safety category.

The inclusion of vehicle safety features on entry-level vehicles is improving, with the majority of vehicles in this category offering moderate to acceptable safety features. The value threshold for vehicles considered was raised from previous years to R270 000.

In terms of true safety points attained, points of 20 or less are considered as having “poor” safety. Safety points between 20 and 50 can be considered as having “moderate” safety, and safety points of 50 and above can be considered as having “acceptable” safety.

Football Highlights

“The fact that so many vehicles offer moderate or acceptable safety is extremely encouraging and indicates that manufacturers are taking the presence of critical vehicle safety equipment seriously. This is a good trend, and we hope to see even fewer vehicles in the poor category in the years ahead,” said the AA.

Two important figures provide context for the development of the ELVS: South Africa’s high annual road fatality figures, and the growing vehicle population in the country. In 2021, the country recorded 12 541 road fatalities. The current vehicle population in the country – according to official figures from the Road Traffic Management Corporation – is 11 726 476, with just over 7.6 million being motor vehicles and just over 2.6 million being LDVs/bakkies.

“The purpose of the research is to provide consumers with a starting point for vehicle purchases, be they new or second-hand. We point out what safety features are stated as being available on these vehicles and urge consumers to consider these a priority as part of their decision-making process,” said the AA.

The association pointed out, however, that this research does not provide a definitive measure of a vehicle’s safety, which can only be determined through crash-testing.

“The data presented in the ELVS, nonetheless, provides an indication of a vehicle’s safety equipment. The large vehicle population and the country’s high road fatality figure point to a need for extensive road safety education and the need for better road safety management in the country. They also point to a need for consumers to prioritise safety in the vehicles they purchase. The ELVS report should serve as a basis for their research,” the AA said.

The 38 vehicles surveyed for the 2022 ELVS report were evaluated against the number of active safety features they have (anti-lock braking systems, electronic stability control), and passive safety features (airbags). Points are awarded to vehicles for the existence of each of the active and passive safety features. Additional points are awarded to vehicles crash-tested under the NCAP system, in this case Global NCAP’s #SaferCarsforAfrica programme.

Of the 38 vehicles researched, 34 are equipped with Anti-lock Braking Systems (ABS) and 33 are equipped with driver and passenger airbags. Despite this positive showing, only seven vehicles researched have Electronic Stability Control (ESC). The least common safety feature was curtain airbags (no vehicles) and side airbags (only one vehicle).

In 2019, the AA supported the #StopTheCrash partnership to demonstrate the effectiveness of among other technologies, ESC and ABS. The technologies showcased have the potential to save thousands of lives every year, and the United Nations has developed international standards to help encourage countries around the world to mandate these life-saving technologies.

“The inclusion of these safety features protects motorists, it’s as simple as that. The inclusion of ESC, for instance, must be considered more seriously by manufacturers as this is a proven technology that can reduce road crashes. We reiterate our call that this technology comes as standard for entry-level vehicles available in South Africa,” said the AA.

The AA noted that this is desktop research and that the definitive measure of a vehicle’s safety can only be acquired through crash-testing. Similar to the Datsun Go+, the Nissan NP300 would have scored highly in this research, but it scored zero stars in the Global NCAP crash-testing. The data presented here should be used as an indication of a vehicle’s safety equipment, and not as the sole indicator of the vehicle’s overall safety rating.

Safety/Affordability Index

In addition to scoring the vehicles purely on safety features and awarding true safety points, the ELVS report also considers safety weighed against affordability. In this scenario, the score achieved by a vehicle for its safety features is measured against its cost to arrive at a safety/affordability score. The index can be used as a guide to understand the “affordability of safety” proposition of vehicles.

For this report, a score of four points and above can be seen as “acceptable safety/affordability”, a score between three and 3.99 points can be seen as “moderate safety/affordability”, whereas 2.99 points and below can be seen as “poor safety/affordability”.

In 2022, five vehicles fall under the acceptable safety/affordability category, eight vehicles fall under the moderate safety/affordability category, and 25 vehicles fall under the poor safety/affordability categories.

A complete breakdown of the affordability/safety index and the methodology used to calculate the scores is contained in the ELVS report, available at

Source: AA

About the author